Skip to content
United States United States United Kingdom United Kingdom Germany Germany
Login search mimeo contact mimeo

How a Global Clinical Research Organization Standardized Site Document Printing Across Europe

CHALLENGE

Before adopting Mimeo, this global clinical research organization (CRO), which manages multi-country clinical trials for sponsors across the pharmaceutical and biotech space, relied on a patchwork of local print vendors to prepare and distribute site documentation. Which vendor handled a project depended entirely on where the responsible team member happened to be based, so colleagues spread across 15 countries in Europe were each working from a different process with no shared standard.

That fragmentation created real friction. Local vendors had limited capability, which made consistent quality difficult to guarantee across sites. Direct-to-site shipping wasn’t part of the workflow, so the CRO’s own staff had to manage an extra distribution step themselves. Altogether, this added roughly 7 to 8 days to preparation timelines compared to a more streamlined process.

The stakes were high, too. These materials, including investigator site files, informed consent forms, and patient cards, are directly patient-facing and subject to regulatory audits and inspections. In-house clinical research associates (CRAs) were manually collating documents, assembling binders, and coordinating shipments themselves, often relying on email to move files between teams and vendors. With confidential, trial-critical documentation, that manual, email-dependent process carried real risk of missed pages, inconsistent quality, and confidentiality gaps.

As one member of the CRO’s clinical operations team put it: “These materials are directly patient-facing and subject to regulatory inspections and audits later, so it’s crucial for us to trust in the quality and confidentiality of our vendor.”

HOW MIMEO HELPED

Mimeo replaced that patchwork of regional vendors with a single, standardized platform the CRO's in-house team could use no matter where they were located. Every CRA now works from the same process, with the same training and the same quality standard for every deliverable, whether that's an initial site binder or a mid-trial update.

The platform was also configured around the CRO's regional needs. For Europe, where most hospitals and sites use two-ring binders, Mimeo added a special instruction so the team could order that format by default. The team also uses booklets for brochures and loose, stapled pages for the frequent document updates that continue throughout a trial's lifecycle.

Day to day, the workflow now starts once materials clear regulatory approval. The in-house team organizes files, runs a quality check, and bulk-uploads everything to Mimeo, building binders, booklets, or stapled packets directly in the platform. Because items can be saved and reordered across multiple sites, a single order can scale into a mass sendout without rebuilding the package from scratch each time. Direct-to-site shipping, once a separate manual step, is now built into the process.

"It's the biggest advantage for us," said one team member. "We went from a point process spread across colleagues in 15 countries in Europe to a global, company-scale process. Now we have one solid platform that standardizes everything and can be accessed by anyone, no matter their location."

THE RESULT

The shift to a standardized, portal-based process has changed how quickly the team can move. What used to take two weeks of manual preparation, printing each page, sorting it, and coordinating shipment, now takes about two days, a reduction of roughly 85%. In the first 7 months of using Mimeo, the team shipped out roughly 2,500 complex bound documents to 47 sites across 8 different countries.

The time savings extend to individual sites as well. The team estimates that delegating print and assembly work to Mimeo saves approximately 6 to 7 hours of staff time per site, covering everything that used to go into vendor emails, sorting printed materials, assembling binders, quality checking, and managing shipments. Across a typical 10-site project, that adds up to an estimated 60 to 70 hours saved, though the exact percentage varies by project scope.

Beyond raw time, the process is simply more reliable. With a central platform, the team has a full history of what was ordered, what still needs to be updated, and where potential errors might be. That visibility has made quality checks easier and reduced the kind of missed documentation that was more common under the old, manual system.

THE BOTTOM LINE

With printing and shipping handled through a standardized platform, the CRO's in-house staff have been able to redirect their time toward higher-value work, including deeper maintenance of investigator site files and other project needs that used to take a back seat to manual document prep. "The whole process is more reliable now," one team member said. "We have the full history of what was ordered, what needs an update, and we can catch mistakes more easily than before."

That reliability, paired with the time freed up, has let the team focus less on the mechanics of printing and shipping and more on the clinical work itself. As one team member summed it up: "That freed-up time is incredibly valuable for us as a company."